Ex-Intel CEO Brian Krzanich gets blasted over landing a new job at automotive AI company

zohaibahd

Posts: 632   +15
Staff
What just happened? Former Intel CEO Brian Krzanich has landed a new high-profile gig as the head of automotive AI technology firm Cerence. However, Cerence's announcements celebrating its new hire stirred up intense criticism and backlash from many.

It all started with an official Cerence statement last week, proudly touting Krzanich's appointment as CEO and board member, highlighting his success and 36-year tenure at Intel. The company noted that Intel's annual revenue saw notable improvement under Krzanich's leadership from 2013-2018.

"During his tenure, he led Intel into emerging areas ranging from cloud computing and artificial intelligence to autonomous driving as the business scaled from $52 billion to more than $70 billion in revenue," Cerence boasted.

Arun Sarin, Cerence's board chairman, also proclaimed Krzanich an excellent choice to lead the company's transition, stating, "His leadership skills and expertise in AI and cloud computing make Brian the right leader to guide Cerence through this transition, capitalize on Cerence's growth opportunities and drive shareholder value."

However, the celebratory tone quickly soured as tech insiders voiced outrage over the hiring decision on social media. Tom's Hardware noted that the backlash grew so heated that Cerence had to shut down comments on their LinkedIn announcement.

One of the most scathing critiques came from Jonathan Huang, a former Intel veteran now at Apple. Huang first blasted Cerence, saying that the board of directors might have "lost their marbles." He snarkily criticized Krzanich for "perfecting the art of making a mess" and lacking vision while leading Intel.

Huang accused the ex-CEO of mismanaging the chip giant with "questionable acquisitions and share buybacks" funded by laying off talented employees. All of this is at the cost of Intel continuing to get pounded by its rivals like Nvidia. The layoffs bothered him the most. He stated that those employees lost their jobs for no good reason other than Krzanich's poor strategies. The post sparked a heated discussion on X/Twitter, too.

Ironically, Intel did not fire Krzanich over performance issues. It offered him the chance to resign in 2018 after violating company policy by having a consensual workplace relationship. While Cerence hoped adding an experienced tech titan would bolster its AI ambitions, the intense backlash suggests many are unwilling to forgive Krzanich's mixed legacy at Intel.

Krzanich gets credit for pivoting the company toward IoT and cloud during the general decline in the PC market. He's also known for boosting Intel's stock by a massive 120 percent as CEO.

However, his decision to skip scaling EUV manufacturing tools contributed to delays in getting 10nm chips out the door. This misstep allowed rivals like TSMC and Samsung to seize process leadership and gave AMD an edge that eroded Intel's market dominance. Intel's fortunes never fully rebounded after that.

Although Pat Gelsinger took the helm in 2021, aiming to right the ship, the company continues to struggle. The situation arguably added an exclamation point when Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang's net worth recently eclipsed Intel's entire market valuation.

Permalink to story:

 
Of course he moves to the creepiest unregulated sector of modern tech. This move is perfect for him to openly pursue his parasitic ambitions.
 
I wouldn't worry: Getting a position on AI is such a huuuge gamble most people wouldn't take it as a serious position knowing it has very high chances of having less than 3-4 years turnaround before the AI bubble inevitably bursts.

Only people pushing AI were the ones that were pushing the ponzi scheme from the beginning like Jensen at Nvidia and I bet even he will get out of his position right before AI crashes. We will probably never know for sure outside of him still being among the top of the Forbes list even when that ship inevitably sinks.
 
....."and drive shareholder value."

Yeah.......that about sums everything up, don't you think?

Can't say that I've ever heard of Cerence -but 'Automotive technology' nowadays just makes me think of automakers trying to hoover up every bit of information that they can from the poor saps who are driving their 'connected vehicles'..... ( not forgetting, of course, trying to shove ads down their throats whilst driving , no doubt).
 
Huang (any relation to a guy who likes leather jackets?) is trying WAYYYY too hard IMO.

Here's my $0.02:

The guy who was at the helm over at Intel when Haswell, Haswell Refresh and Skylake were produced could not possibly be that much of a villain.

I don't like Huang. Did I mention that?
 
Huang has an ax to grind and he's commenting based through biased sunglasses. He likely criticizes everyone always.

I worked for BK after he left Intel and moved to CDK Global. He was a great leader. He managed through annoying activist investors who only wanted to suck the wind out of their sails (by destroying the product) with stupid demands delivered as "suggestions".

He made tough decisions and made CDK very profitable. So profitable they were acquired by a PE firm and fired him on day 1. The PE firm ~ 2 years later messed the company up so badly again that they need a BK to survive the storm they created.

I would absolutely work for BK again and have been watching to see where he goes to see if they have openings.

And PS, I'm female and never once felt uneasy with the guy.

Don't give the critics any energy. They're just jealous.
 
Back