Zen 5 sales have not gone well and AMD is struggling to sell Ryzen 9000 CPUs. Let's analyze the flow-on effects this is having across the rest of the CPU market.
Zen 5 sales have not gone well and AMD is struggling to sell Ryzen 9000 CPUs. Let's analyze the flow-on effects this is having across the rest of the CPU market.
There is a combination of problems. It's obvious they offer little over the previous generation whole being expensive. However, being expensive never stopped enthusiasts from upgrading in the past. I think the real issue is that we're in what I've heard people call a "silent recession" and they just don't have the money to spend.
They gave away trillions in free money during covid, what we're experiencing now is a "hangover" from all the free money. What the FED is doing now is taking that money out of circulation. Neither Biden or Trump have any control over the FED.Silent because you cant admit you caused one before an election
It’s not as huge a problem for AMD as the article says though… as long as the primary competition is ALSO AMD, they’ll be making money…
Eventually they’ll run out of Ryzen 4 parts and you’ll have no choice but to get 9000 series… Unelss the next Intel is competitive, this will remain the same for awhile…
Kind of reminds me of MS releasing Windows 11… (and 10, 8, 7 etc)… people said it wasn’t as good as the previous version and “adoption was slow”… but since there was no alternative, people adopted eventually anyways…
2. AMD was an Intel subcontractor for the x386 CPU's, up until they improved the engineering of the X386 and started selling higher clocked ones that Intel could not match. Intel sued AMD to strip them of the X86 cross licensing agreement and prevent them from being able to make any more X386 cpu's. The X86 licensing legal battle lasted something like 7 years (AMD won finally and to this day can continue to make X86 cpu's.)
4. AMD developed the AMD X86-64 instruction set NOT Intel.
I bought zen4 laptop so I can use windows 10I purposely buy AMD because:
1. I am a huge fan of the late cofounder Jerry Sanders who said "People first, product and profit will follow."
2. AMD was an Intel subcontractor for the x386 CPU's, up until they improved the engineering of the X386 and started selling higher clocked ones that Intel could not match. Intel sued AMD to strip them of the X86 cross licensing agreement and prevent them from being able to make any more X386 cpu's. The X86 licensing legal battle lasted something like 7 years (AMD won finally and to this day can continue to make X86 cpu's.)
3. Intel being sore loosers and very unethical bribed big name PC manufacturers to only use Intel cpu's even though the AMD Athlon cpu's were superior, AMD sued intel over that and won.
4. AMD developed the AMD X86-64 instruction set NOT Intel.
5. Yes, I also agree that AMD brings value because of it's longevity of it's platforms. I too run the 5800X3D processor on the Gigabyte Aorus Master motherboard. The performance advantage of AM5 7800X3D over AM4 5800X3D and the hardware costs to transition to AM5, DDR5, at the time I built my system, did not convince me to build AM5.
Intel has run out of RMA units for 13900 and 14900 series chips. I have heard that every single datacenter user takes their cash refund and INSTANTLY buys a 9950x