WiFi 8 promises the same fast speeds of WiFi 7 with more reliable connections and signal routing

Cal Jeffrey

Posts: 4,334   +1,504
Staff member
Forward-looking: Wireless technology is continuously evolving. Despite the IEEE having not ratified WiFi 7 yet, WiFi 8 is already in the works. WiFi 8, officially designated IEEE 802.11bn, is slated for release in September 2028, so we have a while before we see mass implementation. While full details have not emerged on the new standard, we know a few things about it.

A white paper by MediaTek notes that 802.11bn will be almost identical to 802.11be (WiFi 7). The chart below shows that the maximum channel bandwidth remains at 320MHz with a maximum physical layer rate of 23Gbps. Of course, these theoretical thresholds are under optimum "laboratory" conditions. MediaTek estimates real-world results to be around 80 percent of those numbers.

The primary difference will be in its throughput efficiency. Instead of focusing on speed, the working group is improving reliability. If you have ever run a speed test on your WiFi, you may have noticed how jaggy the download speed is sometimes, with bursts of speed for a second and then plummeting before being averaged with the packets sent during the test. The IEEE wants to level that out, making wireless connections more reliable and consistent.

The current plan is to have WiFi capable of supporting networks with minimum aggregated throughput reaching 100Gbps, enough to handle multiple gigabit-speed connections through a single router. The blueprint for enabling this involves targeting how devices interact with the network. A few notable advancements include Coordinated Spatial Reuse, Coordinated Beamforming, and Dynamic Subchannel Operation.

Coordinated Spatial Reuse enables access points to harmonize their power outputs. It allows closer devices to optimize their connections without interfering with distant ones. Early tests of this technology have shown increases in throughput of up to 25 percent.

Coordinated Beamforming is an extension of beamforming techniques seen in previous generations. Devices with Co-BF can route signals more accurately between devices in a crowded network. While Co-BF will be barely noticeable in small networks, it could be a game changer for public hotspots or home networks with many connected devices.

Lastly, Dynamic Subchannel Operation assigns data subchannels to devices based on their capabilities and needs. For example, if several machines are downloading the same file, DSO will automatically assign the more advanced devices a subchannel for downloading the file faster. This technology already exists in WiFi 7 but has to be administered manually. WiFi 8 access points can automatically determine the capabilities and needs of each device on the network and route data more efficiently.

WiFi 8's focus on user experience over speed is a notable shift in the 802.11 design philosophy. When implemented, the final draft of the 802.11bn standard should bring smoother, more efficient network environments. For home users, this means a more seamless wireless experience with fast, stable connections. For enterprise users, WiFi should provide the same speed and reliability without some of the more complex administration tasks.

Permalink to story:

 
What is needed is range improvement in the new standards. Super fast WiFi is of limited utility when it only works at that speed in the same room as the router.
 
What is needed is range improvement in the new standards. Super fast WiFi is of limited utility when it only works at that speed in the same room as the router.
Range improvement means more wattage being used to transmit. That, with 30 nearby Wi-Fi networks, would be a bit messy. In a sparsely populated area it would be great. But, isn't that what mesh systems are for?
 
Last edited:
What is needed is range improvement in the new standards. Super fast WiFi is of limited utility when it only works at that speed in the same room as the router.
The manufacturers want to sell as many APs to a customer as possible. I'm in agreement with you though. I remember getting my first wireless router in 2006 and I could pick WiFi signal outside for about 50-60m on 2.4Ghz B. Obviously not a lot of bandwidth but the signal went so far.
 
The manufacturers want to sell as many APs to a customer as possible. I'm in agreement with you though. I remember getting my first wireless router in 2006 and I could pick WiFi signal outside for about 50-60m on 2.4Ghz B. Obviously not a lot of bandwidth but the signal went so far.

2.4G still a thing, you can manually set it so your router can split both signals 2.4 and 5G. Also security wise I don't want my signal being transmitted across my neightbor's house.

But that aside if would be cool if you have a big house to be able to set a bigger range with more bandwidth.

Having 30 signals around your home router can be mitigated by scanning with a Wifi Analyzer and see what channel are your neightbors using and just change your router to another not being use, we have plenty of channels to choose from.

I do agree security wise and performance wise is better to have a mesh system, of course is going to be expensive.
 
The manufacturers want to sell as many APs to a customer as possible. I'm in agreement with you though. I remember getting my first wireless router in 2006 and I could pick WiFi signal outside for about 50-60m on 2.4Ghz B. Obviously not a lot of bandwidth but the signal went so far.
I remember back in 2006 my friend couldn't afford internet so he bought $20 wifi card with a long antenna on it and soldered the can to the antenna. He then pointed the can at a church ACROSS THE RIVER from his house and was able to get "acceptable" service. I think it was like 80KB/sec or something which was basically half the speed of DSL.

That also reminded me how it took me YEARS to get my dad to agree to upgrade to cable from DSL simply because he hated Comcast. He didn't upgrade to cable until 2011 and I had already moved out from college. I think that was mostly because Verizon bought our local telecom and was making people upgrade to Fios. He finally went to Comcast because "Verizon isn't going to strong arm me into paying more money"

Good times
 
Hot take but I get the feel that WiFi standards really are the masters of kiting the tech world with improvements they could have implemented two gens ago.

Yeah I know, standards organizations do business too and have to sell you your appliance again.
 
Last edited:
Hot take but I get the feel that WiFi standards really are the masters of kiting the tech world with updates that could have been implemented two gens ago.

Yeah I know, standards organizations do business too and have to sell you your appliance again.

I do understand why you say this, although realistically, I don't think WiFi is slow with respect to time from spec finalization to consumer products being available with it in them. WiFi 7 certification was only ratified earlier this year, and sure enough, products hit the market on nearly the same day it was finalized. You can't really get a quicker release than that.

WiFi 7 was in draft status for 3 years. Considering it required global cooperation on 6GHz usage, this is a remarkably quick time period. Also in that time, brand new chipsets had to be designed and tested all while the actual implementation details were subject to change at any time. It's a small miracle any functional WiFi 7 devices were released this year at all.



 
I do understand why you say this, although realistically, I don't think WiFi is slow with respect to time from spec finalization to consumer products being available with it in them. WiFi 7 certification was only ratified earlier this year, and sure enough, products hit the market on nearly the same day it was finalized. You can't really get a quicker release than that.

WiFi 7 was in draft status for 3 years. Considering it required global cooperation on 6GHz usage, this is a remarkably quick time period. Also in that time, brand new chipsets had to be designed and tested all while the actual implementation details were subject to change at any time. It's a small miracle any functional WiFi 7 devices were released this year at all.
All that was off my point.
 
Range improvement means more wattage being used to transmit. That, with 30 nearby Wi-Fi networks, would be a bit messy. In a sparsely populated area it would be great. But, isn't that what mesh systems are for?
Then also the ability to not create interference to other networks. Then it is possible that there is something like that but it requires drastically different hardware
 
The manufacturers want to sell as many APs to a customer as possible. I'm in agreement with you though. I remember getting my first wireless router in 2006 and I could pick WiFi signal outside for about 50-60m on 2.4Ghz B. Obviously not a lot of bandwidth but the signal went so far.
Far more people with wifi since then, right?
And because of that I have to scan for a less congested channel sometimes.
 
Places barely use WiFi 5 properly, let alone 6, and then 7 or 8, so they need to slow down with the new standards and instead work on making current standards better instead of inventing **** no one will give half a s--- about for 10-15 years at the earliest.
 
Places barely use WiFi 5 properly, let alone 6, and then 7 or 8, so they need to slow down with the new standards and instead work on making current standards better instead of inventing **** no one will give half a s--- about for 10-15 years at the earliest.

If you really care then use Cat 6 or whatever - The mesh systems aren't cheap , and everything in the link needs to be wifi 8 to get full benefit . See what std Zen 6 brings, easiest enough for M/B manufacture's to upgrade BT and Wifi to latest versions.
Also I think mainly about latency for gaming
all else is dependant on ISP speeds etc

Plus maybe huge benefits for those in apartments with 1001 seen wifi connections
 
We're already at an overkill point. I ran a 100 foot cat 8 cable (40 GBbps) to our attic and attached a Wifi 6 access point. It blankets the entire house. With the 5Ghz band I'm getting over 600Mb/s at my den computer on the 2nd floor. I just use the 2.4 Ghz band. Why expose ourselves to more emf than necessary.

I wonder if Google is mapping people's homes. Wifi can already be used to physically map the rooms around the router. Much like the sensor in Aliens.

https://www.popularmechanics.com/te...068/scientists-use-wifi-to-see-through-walls/
 
Last edited:
Back