CEO fires 90% of his company for missing a meeting, many were unpaid workers

midian182

Posts: 10,235   +138
Staff member
WTF?! Firing 99 people and telling them to "get the f*ck out" because they never attended a meeting seems a tad excessive, even by CEO standards. But what makes this situation even more shocking is that many of those let go were unpaid remote part-time workers. The boss in question, however, remains unrepentant.

Baldvin Oddsson, CEO of Wyoming-based musical-instrument online storefront the Musicians Club, was far from happy when just 11 of the company's 110 employees and contracted freelancers turned up to a meeting at 8:30 am on Friday, November 15. His response was to fire the offending 90% of staff via Slack.

A message sent at 8.24 am warned that anyone not at the meeting would be fired by 1 pm. Keeping to his word, Oddsson sent another message later that day. It started with "This is Baldvin, the CEO."

"For those of you who did not show up to the meeting this morning, consider this your official notice: you're all fired," he wrote. "You failed to do what you agreed to, you failed to complete your part of the contract, and you failed to show up for the meetings you were supposed to attend and work for."

Baldvin said all agreements between workers and the company were being canceled. He instructed the now jobless staff to return anything from the firm, sign out of all accounts, and remove themselves from the Slack group, "immediately."

"I gave you an opportunity to make your life better, to work hard, and to grow. Yet, you have shown me that you don't take this seriously," his rant continued.

Just in case anyone doubted Baldvin's indignation, he signed off the message with "Get the f – k out of my business right now."

An anonymous source told MusicTech that "there was virtually no notice of a meeting […] At around 8:23 AM CST, [Oddsson] threatened anyone who did not show up to be fired," adding that it "sent the group leaders and long-time workers into a frenzy."

We've seen CEOs make mass layoffs over messaging platforms before, like the Better.com boss who fired 900 employees during a three-minute Zoom call in December 2021. But it's hard to recall an instance as profanity laced and angry as Baldvin's, and what's even worse is that many of the people he fired were working for free.

Fortune notes that many of the Musicians Club's jobs are targeted at classical music students looking for work experience. One listing from earlier this year for an unpaid operations manager offered "in-depth understanding of e-commerce operations within a competitive market," and "practical experience in managing and optimizing online sales platforms." There was also a "high-potential" that the role would become full-time and paid in 2025.

A former intern for the company wrote on Reddit that the Musicians Club is a startup that relies on remote interns willing to work for nothing.

"A big problem was that because all of the workers are unpaid and remote, they all had different schedules, so apparently it was difficult to set a specific time for attendance, which was what the CEO was so mad about," they wrote. The intern had joined the company in an unpaid cybersecurity role an hour before the 99 people were fired. They wrote that after "attending a meeting and hearing about the terrible work conditions caused by the CEO, I deactivated my account and left. There's no way I'm going to put work into this potential headache of a company."

Baldvin wrote about the incident on LinkedIn, stating that some people have attempted to "cancel" him. He stands by his decisions and says firing the individuals was the right move. His LinkedIn profile shows he is currently hiring. Good luck with that.

Permalink to story:

 
The interview scene in the movie "Emily the criminal" says it all for me.

There's a spate of these types of incidents at the moment. Is there some global competition to be the worst CEO?
 
It doesn't matter what that CEO was smoking. Most self-appointed CEO-s are no-gooders, and not to be trusted. Good CEO-s are normally appointed by the company owners and the board of directors, to never let idi0ts like Baldvin Oddsson ruin the company.

Is there some global competition to be the worst CEO?
Those are all self-appointed CEO-s, people who have no clue what they are doing, and tend to go unhinged all the way, without any accountability.
 
Last edited:
If I wasnt on the list, you can bet I wouldnt have returned. I would never work for someone like that. My life is far to precious to be "owned" by some egotistical maniac CEO who thinks nothing in the world is more important than him. Ive seen these types before in the industry, nope. Plenty of respectful boss's out there who can communicate effectively. No need to work for someone toxic.

Its also funny how his flex is firing unpaid music interns. Wow, tough guy there. He really shook up the industry with that one.
 
One more ***** making that movie "Horrible Bosses" a reality lol

(Fantastic halarious movie, and sequel - go watch them, and go buy your Shower Buddy asap!)

*Seriously? - I can't say *****? lol...
 
Last edited:
As a boss if you are not prepared to work 18 hour days and sleep on your desk then GTFO
As for BS about daughters birthday, she only had one, and 2 hours off at the hospital is more than enough
We are like a big family here anyway

Did I tell you jackels the story about the Lion's Share ?
 
This guy was using a sneaky form of down-sizing. Kinda scummy, but perfectly legal. He called a mandatory meeting, they didn't show. Job lost.
 
This guy was using a sneaky form of down-sizing. Kinda scummy, but perfectly legal. He called a mandatory meeting, they didn't show. Job lost.

Not too sure about this being some kind of legal genius strategy. It sounds like these were at will employees who he could fire any time for any or no reason. So sure he can blame it on this scenario but he didn't need to. It's ultimately irrelevant.

Now let's imagine there were contracts or say union arrangements in place. We weren't given the details of this meeting or why people didn't attend, but it sounds like given time zones and class schedules and part time work the CEO knew many would not get the notice and/or not be able to attend given other commitments. I imagine if you tried mass layoffs "for cause" under such a manufactured scenario to avoid your contractual or legal responsibilities you'd be hearing from the lawyers and the regulatory agencies.
 
It's not a tad excessive at all actually , this is the way REAL life works . Unfortunately our colleges are abysmal at preparing people for the real world these days . Many actually provide safe spaces and other ridiculously absurd things for when students have to deal with a stressful event . It's beyond absurdity .

If the employees said they would be there than THEY BETTER BE THERE AND ON TIME . This isn't an anomaly, this is the norm .
 
"I gave you an opportunity to make your life better, to work hard, and to grow"
Translation:
"I gave you an opportunity to make me richer while you're getting nowhere, but because I'm an imbecile manchild control freak who can't cope with not everyone bending at his whim immediately, I'll now try to get other people to make me rich who will have even less reservations".
 
If the employees said they would be there

There is no evidence of this in the article. And while I have no idea what happened, to me a 99 out of 110 unexcused absence rate strongly suggests that the relevant factor was a single circumstance that applied to all of them (I.e., whatever shenanigans the boss pulled in (not) "arranging" this meeting properly), vs lots of independent decisions to suddenly act erratically. In any event there's no way the CEO escapes the blame for this. He was ultimately responsible for hiring this bunch, and if 99 of his 110 picks (or the picks of the process he ultimately oversees) were all terrible that's on him.
 
Back