Nvidia nearly doubles AMD's R&D budget – Intel's spending dwarfs both, but struggles to compete

Daniel Sims

Posts: 1,672   +47
Staff
The big picture: The competitive strength of hardware makers is often gauged by their research and development expenditure. However, an analysis of recent financial reports from various tech giants reveals that higher R&D spending does not always guarantee success. Intel's recent struggles and Nvidia's astronomical growth driven by the AI boom have broken conventional assumptions.

Recent insights from Tech Fund reveal a widening disparity in R&D budgets between competing hardware makers AMD and Nvidia, a key factor in Nvidia's increasing market dominance. In that same mix we could look at Intel, which currently appears much weaker than both despite dwarfing their R&D spending.

According to Tech Fund's analysis of Nvidia's and AMD's R&D expenditures over the past decade, Nvidia now spends twice as much as AMD. In 2013, their R&D budgets were roughly equal, but Nvidia's has since surged to approximately $12 billion, while AMD's has grown to ~$6 billion.

This disparity is further accentuated by the allocation of spending. Nvidia focuses nearly all its R&D efforts on AI, while AMD's smaller budget is spread across GPUs, CPUs, AI, and FPGA chips.

Although AMD has made impressive gains in the CPU market – recent generations of its CPUs have soundly defeated Intel – it continues to struggle against Nvidia in the GPU sector.

Intel currently faces seemingly endless trouble in CPUs, GPUs, and other areas despite outspending Nvidia's and AMD's R&D by a wide margin.

Source: Tom's Hardware (click to enlarge)

According to Tom's Hardware, Intel allocated $16 billion to R&D in 2023 – double the combined budgets of Nvidia and AMD. For 2024, the company projects R&D, market growth, and acquisition costs will range between $17 billion and $20 billion.

These funds are spread across diverse ventures, including CPUs, GPUs, quantum computing, and foundries, with significant hopes pinned on its forthcoming 18A process node.

Despite this hefty investment, Intel's market capitalization hovers at around $107 billion, ranking 160th globally. In contrast, AMD ranks 45th with a valuation of $229 billion or more than twice of Chipzilla's. Nvidia, with its near-total devotion to AI, has entered the $3 trillion club and is vying with Apple for the title of the world's most valuable company.

Nvidia's meteoric rise is particularly striking when compared to Apple's R&D spending. The Cupertino giant spent $27 billion on R&D in 2023 and $31 billion between September 2023 and September 2024. While some predict the eventual collapse of the AI bubble, which could bring Nvidia back down to Earth, there are no immediate signs of such a downturn.

Permalink to story:

 
I think the chart shows us that gamers are in for a rough decade until the AI market gets saturated
The 'AI' market won't saturate, it will crash harder than the crypto market. There are only 5 buyers of these chips and they're slowing down their purchases according to reports.
 
The 'AI' market won't saturate, it will crash harder than the crypto market. There are only 5 buyers of these chips and they're slowing down their purchases according to reports.
According to Nvidia - they have backlogs well I to 2026.
Now we’re at a point where large companies are setting up AI parks - then they’ll start to map which services they can provide and what they need to develop (they already started, but we know AI is still in its infancy), and as the sales of services picks up, AI parks will require expansions and new geo locations.
At some point that market will stagnate - but not for the next 5-6 years is my prediction
 
And it shows, AMD blows *** in comparison to Nvidia. You gotta spend money to make money AMD, about time you realize that, and then maybe your products might not suck. As for Intel, they are trying to play massive catch-up, so it makes sense that they have to spend so much.
 
And it shows, AMD blows *** in comparison to Nvidia. You gotta spend money to make money AMD, about time you realize that, and then maybe your products might not suck. As for Intel, they are trying to play massive catch-up, so it makes sense that they have to spend so much.

Bear in mind AMD are also competing in cpu sectors, and they're playing intel like a fiddle right now.
 
Bear in mind AMD are also competing in cpu sectors, and they're playing intel like a fiddle right now.

Don't treat Nvidia BOTs like humans.

Nvidia's only advantage over AMD is aggressive control over software and studios. RDNA3 is competitive where it matters, the only product without a direct competitor is the 4090, which only serves about 5-10% of the market.

And no, don't talk to me about RT... RT + UE5 are diseases killing the gaming industry. HUB has already shown how irrelevant RT is.
 
And it shows, AMD blows *** in comparison to Nvidia. You gotta spend money to make money AMD, about time you realize that, and then maybe your products might not suck. As for Intel, they are trying to play massive catch-up, so it makes sense that they have to spend so much.
Ryzen is the best thing to happen to the chip industry so far in this century. Everyone thought AMD would be bankrupt by now before that release.

And don't give me one trick pony arguments... look at Apple.
 
Don't treat Nvidia BOTs like humans.

Nvidia's only advantage over AMD is aggressive control over software and studios. RDNA3 is competitive where it matters, the only product without a direct competitor is the 4090, which only serves about 5-10% of the market.

And no, don't talk to me about RT... RT + UE5 are diseases killing the gaming industry. HUB has already shown how irrelevant RT is.
The 4090 serves less than 2% of the market.
 
R&D is good but the final result is that CUDA just works and is the de facto standard.
Pa7RAFL.jpeg
 
Given their relative market cap and share, AMD is punching well above its weight or Nvidia is well below if the ratio is less than 2:1.

Headline could have also read "Much larger companies spends more on R&D than much smaller company". Stunning turn of affairs!
 
The 'AI' market won't saturate, it will crash harder than the crypto market. There are only 5 buyers of these chips and they're slowing down their purchases according to reports.

AI is data centres, which also happen to be the core of the internet. This idea that "AI will crash" doesn't understand that AI is just a fancy word for machine learning and massive data centres that are needed for everything from Search engines to social media infrastructure. This is just the continous evolution of data centres. "AI" just became a trendy word. Nvidia has been prioritizing their enterprise customers since the early 2010s. It just really took off after the "great accelarator" that was the pandemic. These "5 buyers" that you mentioned are designing their own chips, but they're nowhere near able to match Nvidia. Maybe in the late 2020s they will, but Nvidia's GPUs aren't going anywhere.
 
Don't treat Nvidia BOTs like humans.

Nvidia's only advantage over AMD is aggressive control over software and studios. RDNA3 is competitive where it matters, the only product without a direct competitor is the 4090, which only serves about 5-10% of the market.

And no, don't talk to me about RT... RT + UE5 are diseases killing the gaming industry. HUB has already shown how irrelevant RT is.
That’s actually because RT is currently so taxing that only a small fraction of the lights are ray traced - the devs have to make sure the performance isn’t taxed too much and select a few light sources per area to be raytraced.
If you look at Nvidia ReMix however, you can see how a game with -full- Raytracing can transform - check out the Half Life 2 - Remix RTX project on Youtube, pretty cool
 
Would not be surprised if we see Radeon sell, perhaps even to ARC (Intel) or with ARC (to third party) -- AMD's smaller budget is spread across GPUs, CPUs, AI, and FPGA chips as it struggles to remain relevant in the GPU sector, and then with Nvidia nearly doubles AMD's R&D budget only which make for more impacts to AMD GPUs future.

For AMD gaming and sales of Radeon cards no matter the debate that 7900 XTX and other cards perform well (4080 and down), sales are terrible vs nVidia with consumers strongly choosing RTX over Radeon, if AMD today stopped making the 7900 XTX would it compete better then in the mid-range? Only say that as that is the goal moving forward, don't make upper end cards in so much they will then sell more mid and low range models (which they already have today) which my guess is they really mean drop prices or maybe not ???
 
Back