Trump proposes 25% tariff on Canadian and Mexican imports, 10% on Chinese goods

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 280   +7
Staff
TL;DR: Another day, another proposal from Trump to use tariffs to accomplish diplomatic and economic goals. While supporters may view these measures as necessary for protecting American interests, critics warn of higher prices and widespread business disruption. The coming months will likely see intense discussions about the future of global trade relations and the role protectionism should play in the economy.

President-elect Donald Trump has announced plans to impose sweeping tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, and China once he returns to the White House. The controversial declaration has already triggered significant currency fluctuations and raised alarm bells about potential economic disruptions worldwide.

Trump intends to slap a 25 percent tariff on all imports from Canada and Mexico, while adding an extra 10 percent levy on Chinese goods, piling onto existing tariffs. Trump justified these measures by accusing these nations of enabling illegal migration and drug trafficking, particularly the flow of fentanyl into the United States.

The announcement sent immediate ripples through currency markets. The Canadian dollar tumbled 0.9 percent against the US dollar, plummeting to a four-year low. Meanwhile, the Mexican peso took an even harder hit, depreciating by 1.3 percent and exacerbating its recent decline. China's currency also felt the impact, with the renminbi slipping 0.1 percent to 7.25 against the US dollar.

Economists and trade experts have not minced words about the potential consequences of such broad tariffs. "Stiff new tariffs on imports from the US's three largest trading partners would significantly increase costs and disrupt business across all economies involved," Erica York of the Tax Foundation told the Financial Times.

Consumers will certainly feel an impact. According to a recent Consumer Technology Association (CTA) report released prior to the election, a 10 percent global tariff combined with a 60 percent China-specific tariff could increase laptop prices by 45 percent. For instance, a laptop currently priced at $793 would cost consumers an additional $357. Premium models could see even greater increases, adding $450 for every $1,000 of current pricing.

The CTA, which produced the report in partnership with Trade Partnership Worldwide (TPW), projected significant price hikes across a wide range of products. Smartphone costs are expected to rise by 25.8 percent, while monitors are anticipated to see a 31.2 percent increase.

These calculations were made in response to earlier proposals by Trump to impose tariffs of 10 to 20 percent on imported goods, along with a special 60 percent tariff on imports from China.

The international response to Trump's latest announcement was swift. Beijing quickly fired back, with state television CCTV labeling Trump's comments as "irresponsible." In what appeared to be a strategic counter-move, China's Vice President Han Zheng used a global supply chain expo in Beijing to emphasize the country's commitment to open trade and globalization, presenting China as a guardian of free trade despite accusations of heavy subsidies and market barriers.

Mexico's reaction was equally pointed. Ricardo Monreal, leader of Mexico's ruling party in the lower house of congress, said that tariffs would not address the underlying border issues. He warned that escalating trade retaliation would only serve to hurt consumers' pockets, potentially leading to economic hardship on both sides of the border.

Canadian officials also weighed in on the matter. Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland and Public Safety Minister Dominic LeBlanc issued a joint statement highlighting the strong bilateral relationship between Canada and the United States. They emphasized Canada's significant role as a trade partner and energy supplier to the US, noting that Canada purchases more from the United States than China, Japan, France, and the UK combined.

Experts warn of potential disruption to integrated manufacturing sectors, particularly the automotive industry, which relies heavily on cross-border supply chains.

"There's a lot of integration of North American manufacturing in a lot of sectors, particularly autos, so this would be pretty disruptive for a lot of US companies and industries," Warren Maruyama, former general counsel at the Office of the US Trade Representative, told the Financial Times.

Trump's announcement aligns with his campaign rhetoric, which has consistently emphasized aggressive trade policies. He has, at times, threatened even more severe measures, including tariffs of up to 1,000 percent on Chinese cars crossing the southern border and a potential 25 percent tariff on Mexico if it fails to address border security concerns. These numbers are a significant escalation from Trump's previous trade policies during his first term.

While Trump's proposed tariffs are more extreme, it's worth noting that the current Biden administration has also taken steps to increase levies on certain Chinese imports. In May, the Biden administration raised tariffs on imported clean-energy technologies and increased tariffs on electric vehicles from China to 100 percent.

The Biden administration has also been pushing Beijing to crack down on fentanyl production, an effort that has seen some progress with China agreeing to impose controls on key chemical ingredients.

Permalink to story:

 
I don't see it helping anyone. A tax of 50% on Chinese and Korean cars, on another hand, could help the domestic car industry.
 
Good. I want EVERYTHING to double in price and want to see 12% unemployment. with such high tariffs there will be less shipping, less shipping means tens of thousands of truckers out of work. amazon will take a good hit, FFFF bezos... usps, fedex, dhl all will lose thousands of jobs with less shipping, disruption to FOOD IMPORTS will cause chaos in some places, some food chains will will suffer badly. there will be less incoming flights, airport workers will lose some jobs, airline pilots will lose jobs, warehouses will not need as many locations since there is less imported, more people lose jobs, buildings will go empty in some places, mor people lose money and jobs with empty real-estate. tvs, cars, phones will get way more expensive, and quality will go down even more with cost cutting... more lost jobs I cant wait to celebrate. our trade partners will simply increase their tarrifs on our goods, we will ship less..... result, more lost US jobs and a trade war the US CANNOT WIN because on a global scale the US is a bunch of whiny cry babies who do not work work a living... this is going to be delicious ...
 
A blanket tariff on an entire country is just poor business. If you're hoping to boost the local economy and industry you just tariff the the things you actually produce locally, so that people buy local instead of import. The US makes a lot, but still relies heavily on import and that's increasing not decreasing as the country transitions to a tertiary service industry.
 
Given the ... uh ... ''quality'' of US cars I am all for the big three burning to the ground. screw the US car industry. I will never buy ford, dodge of chevy ever ever ever EVER again
Perhaps, but it is more about the employment opportunities for the US citizens than the cars quality. And it will take the new job opportunities to make it possible to improve the quality.
 
Perhaps, but it is more about the employment opportunities for the US citizens than the cars quality. And it will take the new job opportunities to make it possible to improve the quality.
if it cost even more to build a car, which ford chevy and dodge claim for the #1 reason they FIRED thousands of ''workers'' this last 6 months .. I just dont see that happening. cars will cost more, people cant afford them already, now they will get more $$ .. and all they will do is offshore more planta because US cannot compete on a global market place
 
Perhaps, but it is more about the employment opportunities for the US citizens than the cars quality. And it will take the new job opportunities to make it possible to improve the quality.
They've had like a hundred years to make quality goods. They repeatedly fall into last or near last place on the international scale.
They failed and they should be allowed to fail.
 
As long as we offset the higher prices caused by tariffs with the elimination of the income and payroll tax I’m all for it. (We historically funded the government with tariffs before the income tax)
Same. The income tax was a mistake. It makes no sense to tax the 90% who are struggling to get by right now and THEN tax the money they spend. That's insane.
 
As long as we offset the higher prices caused by tariffs with the elimination of the income and payroll tax I’m all for it. (We historically funded the government with tariffs before the income tax)

-AND the Social Security Tax. Trump just has to lower the Tax, let the next guy worry about slashing SS payouts.

Lotta healthy 75 year olds out there that DONT WANT TO WORK!!!

Let me figure out how to save for my retirement, I can do a better job at it than the Government.

 
After reading these posts I am reminded of Dean Wormer. "
Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
 
Trump’s tariffs: where protecting the economy somehow translates into paying $1,200 for a mid-range laptop while buying a second mortgage for an iPhone Pro.
 
The scare tactics begin. Stop listening to the state run media and Tik Tok, it's rotting your brain. All they spread is lies and fear mongering. Tariffs has been around for decades. Some of the stuff you buy now has a tariff attached to it. If the companies didn't move the manufacturing to other countries, we wouldn't have a problem. Remember, in 1872 the United States got rid of the income tax and the federal government was financed through tariffs and excise taxes. On the campaign trail president Trump campaigned to just that, get rid of the income tax and finance the federal government with tariffs and excise taxes.
 
So what I am hearing is that I should consider replacing my 5 year old phone sooner than later...

Maybe start collecting computer parts for the the next PC build that'll replacing my aging 6700k and GTX1080...
 
I don't see it helping anyone. A tax of 50% on Chinese and Korean cars, on another hand, could help the domestic car industry.
They are afraid Chinese EV's will make American car companies look really bad, and don't care to give people cheaper options. It's an excuse to keep the status quo of selling overpriced trash. $100K for a pickup truck? It's a joke. There is no big 3 anymore. Stalantis isn't American owned.
 
25% tariffs to strengthen the US economy...
But if you limit immigration and fentanyl then we good.

You can't make this stuff up.

I'm not going to make fun of your post, just make a few points.

Every dollar the government prints, causes the value of the dollar to be deflated. Now, if you get rid of the illegal immigrants in the country, that wipes a HUGE amount of money that is being printed to support them. If you cut govt spending and no longer run up a huge deficit, this also improves the value of the dollar.

There are many economic factors coming into play. Tariffs can have a very positive impact on the value of the dollar (if everything else is played correctly), and thus negate the increased cost of the items.

I do not think we will see any increases in prices, just decrease in profits. Business have to sell volume to get their discounts. Even if it means smaller profit margins.

I wish the dollar was still valued by the gold standard.
 
The US government needs to find new tax incomes or they will go bankrupt. Nobody wants to pay tax, but they put themselves in a bind.
 
Trump is after concessions from Canada, Mexico and China and thus threatens tariffs. He obviously wants Mexico to close its border and fight the cartels drug peddling. With Canada Trump probably wants them to start spending 2% of GDP on defense as was agreed to 70 years ago, but which they never spend. With China you are dealing with a gangster state. They only thing they understand is bare knuckled tactics.
 
Never take trump to the word. But media wanted to. trump they like to call exaggerated thing to watch for reaction .that is a trait of adhd person. this way pepole come to him for proposition
 
Back