Former Google CEO warns AI girlfriends could lead to obsession and loneliness

midian182

Posts: 10,235   +138
Staff member
Forward-looking: The ability to 'date' an artificial intelligence is the latest long-standing sci-fi trope becoming a reality. Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt isn't a fan of this trend, warning that creating the perfect AI-powered girlfriend could increase loneliness and lead to obsessive behavior.

Speaking about the dangers of AI and regulation on The Prof G Show with Scott Galloway, Schmidt spoke about the ability for young men to create perfect AI romantic partners and fall in love with them. "This is a good example of an unexpected problem of existing technology," Schmidt said.

The former Google boss painted a scenario of an AI boyfriend or girlfriend that is perfect visually and emotionally. He noted that young men are particularly at risk of becoming obsessed and allowing the AI to take over their thinking.

"There's lots of evidence that there's now a problem with young men," Schmidt said. "In many cases, the path to success for young men has been, shall we say, been made more difficult because they're not as educated as the women are now."

"Many of the traditional paths [for young men] are no longer as available and so they turn to the online world for enjoyment and sustenance," Schmidt said, "and because of the social media algorithms they find like-minded people who ultimately radicalize them, either in a horrific way, like terrorism, or in the kind of way you're describing – they're just maladjusted."

We've already seen the consequences of the dangers Schmidt is warning about. In October, a mother sued Character.ai following the death of her teenage son who killed himself after becoming obsessed with one of the company's bots. He had become infatuated with a chatbot based on Game of Thrones character Daenerys Targaryen, who he texted constantly and spent hours alone in his room talking to.

Schmidt noted that teenagers are especially vulnerable to the dangers of AI-powered tech as they are not emotionally developed enough. He believes parents should be more involved with their children's online activity, but admitted there is only so much they can control.

"You put a 12 or 13-year-old in front of these things, and they have access to every evil as well as every good in the world," he said. "And they're not ready to take it."

Schmidt also talked about reforming regulatory laws, especially Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which shields companies and online platforms from liability for content posted by users. He said the law should change "to allow for liability in the worst possible cases, so when someone is harmed from this technology, we need to have a solution to prevent further harm."

Schmidt said he doesn't think Section 230 will be changed over the next four years as the Trump administration has bigger issues to deal with.

Trump's pick for FTC chair, Brendan Carr, has called for limitations on Section 230, which he says has been abused to give tech giants immunity when it comes to censorship. He wants new rules that prevent companies from censoring posts, with some exceptions, allowing users to choose their own fact-checkers and filters.

Permalink to story:

 
At this rate, the future isn’t people walking down the aisle; it’s everyone in a wedding suit plugging in their USB-C spouse.
 
On the censorship/content moderation/Section 230 issue, it's unfortunately a 3-way sword.

On the one edge are the interests of the government, on the second edge are the interest of the companies, and on the third edge are the interests of the individuals.

As both the rights provided and applied by the First Amendment and rules from Section 230 are now, the interests of the companies are best protected.

If the government is allowed to force transparency on moderation decisions or require certain types of content moderation, that erodes the company's First Amendment rights and opens the door for governments to intrude on individuals' rights, too, even though such actions could reduce the spread of hate speech, misinformation, and the transparency requirement would give consumers a (small) bit of agency on the platforms that they use.

If the companies are held liable for user generated content, then a few bad actors could shut down the platform, depriving other individuals of their use of the platform.

And as it's written now, platforms can basically moderate as they wish without many liability concerns, to the benefit or detriment of the individuals that use the platform. On some platforms this more impactful, such as YouTube, where the platforms can wield their "demonetization" sword.

AI romance partner platforms will naturally take advantage of this state of affairs, for better or worse. The most likely type of regulation we will see around these platforms is age verification requirements, pending the outcome from the Supreme Court case between Pornhub and the various states on this topic.
 
Without meaning to joke, but normal relationships do the same thing, people seem to hate each other and are self-centered, relationships require effort, concessions and caring about the other side, which most people don't do... that's why lasting relationships are becoming increasingly rare. I think one problem creates another... I've already read about one guy marrying a doll and another getting divorced and "marrying" the porn collection.

Yeah, the world really is upside down... guys. Soon, trying to be "normal" will become different, exotic...
 
Prawn addiction , TV soap addiction , Sugar addiction , Violent video games addiction.
Apparently anything and everything can become an "addiction"

As I have referred to before with my son about using his iPad seeing casino adverts , YT adverts etc . he says most young people become immune to them and blank them out

So speaking of immunity, The theory is "vaccinating" people through education can actually give quite wide range immunity . Lots of ongoing research into this stuff. Like the other topic du jour mis-information

Even simple education from yesteryear

Recognise the 5 main tactics of high pressure salesmen - and predict their next statement or action
How supermarkets/adverts try to influence your spending
Quite popular at moment how to recognise and deal with a narcissistic person

So the answer to most of these "addictions" is learning about how they operate etc , and mindfulness etc

I'm sure lots of hill billys on here soon learn immunity when the moved to NYC. hello kind Sir, my girlfriend and myself need nappies for our baby and we can't afford them

That actually happened to me as a 22 year old - I said ok thinking $5 , shop sold them to me for $15 - they were probably in on the scam. My NYC friend had a good laugh when I told her
 
Without meaning to joke, but normal relationships do the same thing, people seem to hate each other and are self-centered, relationships require effort, concessions and caring about the other side, which most people don't do... that's why lasting relationships are becoming increasingly rare. I think one problem creates another... I've already read about one guy marrying a doll and another getting divorced and "marrying" the porn collection.

Yeah, the world really is upside down... guys. Soon, trying to be "normal" will become different, exotic...

https://listverse.com/2018/01/14/10-people-who-married-inanimate-objects/

I agree, it's a very interesting ranking although at the same time a reflection of human madness.
 
Back